Wednesday 20 January 2021

READING THE CARE MANIFESTO


Many people reading English and American books while coming of age in the early 1970s, found that Robert M. Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, a classic of travel, philosophy and homage to the motorcycle, influenced them greatly. Even if they didn’t ride or maintain motorcycles. Even if they didn’t travel far or study the philosophies of the Eastern and the Western worlds.

Pirsig described his book as an inquiry into values. He detailed how important ‘care’ was in all aspects of life, including in the maintenance of second-hand motorcycles.

I remembered the previous owner had said a mechanic had told him the plate was hard to get on. That was why. The shop manual had warned about this, but like the others he was probably in too much of a hurry or he didn’t care. 

Pirsig focussed on the word ‘quality’ as a key with which to unlock a path to the good life, lived fairly and justly. This focus on words is an example of a poet’s aphorism, as written by Seamus Heaney.

If you have the words, there’s always a chance that you’ll find the way.

Now, almost fifty years after Pirsig’s classic was first published, another book picks up the opportunity for change offered by one word: Care. It is not a lyrical book like Pirsig’s, but a direct assertion of political philosophy, forthrightly named The Care Manifesto.

It is written by a group of academics, who came together in 2017 as a reading and discussion group. They are based in England. They work in various universities, in the fields of sociology, consumer studies, media studies and American studies. They decry carelessness, citing the pandemic as an occasion of negligence and waste. 

The first page slams government choices

to waste billions on military hardware against distant or non-existent threats and to funnel money to the already rich.

The writers apply the word ‘care’ to the challenges of politics, kinships, communities, states, economics and climate. They write short, well-structured chapters, only very occasionally slipping into academic jargon. The language is clear and the arguments are cogent. 

Writing in The Guardian, members of the Care Collective made bold assertions about ‘care’:

This very old word is newly fashionable, and with some unexpected twists.

They use it to as the foundation of a politics of interdependence:

We are never outside the social, we are not the autonomous individuals some fantasise themselves to be. There is only interdependence in human existence, as we lean towards and upon each other, as well as on all that sustains the world we inhabit.

In this Age of Pandemics, it is useful to have a manifesto to open our thoughts to possibilities of coping and improvement that might become real in the world, even in the hackneyed sense of creating the ‘new normal’.

Welcome and affirming though this manifesto is, implementing it will require an undoing of current power structures, a re-description of the word ‘power’ itself and a construction of a more just and fair world, with Care at the root of it all.

Not a problem. It’s with us and ahead of us. Seamus Heaney said it:

The way we are living, timorous or bold, will have been our life. 

The Care Manifesto by the Care Collective? Highly recommended.



The Care Manifesto – the politics of interdependence; book; The Care Collective;Verso; London, 2020

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/04/coronavirus-care-central-society-politics

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance; book; Robert M. Pirsig; Vintage Classics; London, 1991

Seamus Heaney quotes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuP5fbfUkjk



www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter



Tuesday 5 January 2021

RE-READING THE GREAT GATSBY

 

Re-reading The Great Gatsby felt like revisiting an experience that made a good impression on me first time round, only to find the new experience empty of pleasure, meaning or purpose. There are beautiful sentences, a blizzard of expensive and colourful shirts and a bevy of selfish, wealthy people, none of whom managed to elicit a jot of sympathy from me. 

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novella is considered an American tragedy. Gatsby is considered a tragic figure. It, and he, are not. Gatsby is a conman and a crook. The novella is a romantic melodrama, sensational and sentimental, with an ironically happy ending, shepherding the wealthy home to their mid-western cities, away from the decadence of the eastern seaboard of the U.S.A.. All except Gatsby, who lies murdered in his swimming pool. George Wilson, one of the only truly tragic figures in the story, lies dead nearby. He was previously cuckolded by the boor, Tom Buchanan, and later duped by him into getting rid of Gatsby, who, after all, is nouveau riche at best and, in the eyes of Buchanan and his coterie, no more than ‘white trash’ with bling.

The narrator, Nick Carraway, is an entry-level bond dealer in New York’s financial services sector. He is learning to become a hifalutin usurer, making loans to corporations and governments, usually on fixed terms advantageous to the issuer of the bond. Very large sums of money are involved. Great debts ensue on default. Cue the financial crash in 1929, which follows after the action of the novella.

In a sense, Carraway is a white-collar conman, Ivy League college-educated, thus immune from the whiff of criminality with which F. Scott Fitzgerald infuses Gatsby. F. Scott Fitzgerald conjures more than a whiff of criminality, spiced with anti-semitism, in his presentation of Wolfsheim, Gatsby’s business associate. Carraway says that Wolfsheim’s assistant, a ‘lovely Jewess’, scrutinised him with ‘black, hostile eyes’.

Nick Carraway tells the story in an ‘I’ voice for the most part, shifting to a journalistic 3rd person voice in reporting the final crimes (hit and run, with the driver not stopping; a murder-suicide), until the narration returns to the 1st person voice for the lyrically-described train journeys westward. They cross a snow-covered landscape, somehow more real than that of eastern regions of the U.S.A..The snow-filled journey feels like a lift from the ending of James Joyce’s story The Dead, in particular the resonant lines about another journey westwards.

snow was general over Ireland … faintly falling … upon all the living and the dead’.

This is not the only allusion to major texts of English literature’s modernist period. T.S. Eliot’s The Wasteland is often cited as a touchstone for F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novella. Joseph Conrad’s novella, The Heart of Darkness, is cited as a source for narrative structure and form. Is Carraway modelled on Marlow, the rudderless young man with a well-connected aunt (replaced by Yale University, in Carraway’s case), through whom Conrad presents a tale with no heart and only dim light?

Carraway is a not an unreliable narrator. He is naive and unbelievable. I found his easy acceptance of Gatsby’s backstory hard to credit. What did his years at Yale prepare him for if he readily swallows the guff Gatsby offers him? Gatsby muddies his story at each turn to get Carraway to do his bidding. Gatsby pimps Carraway, who readily falls in love with him.

It is clear that Carraway has a commanding grip on poetic English. Did he get that at Yale, a very expensive university, noted for its academic work in science and economics? Perhaps he majored in Classics. His story-telling is littered with telling passages, such as:

I sat on the front steps while they waited for their car. It was dark here; only the bright door sent ten square feet of light volleying out into the soft, black morning. Sometimes a shadow moved against a dressing-room blind above, gave way to another shadow, an indefinite procession of shadows, that rouged and powdered in an invisible glass.

Volleyed’ is quite the literary rally for a trainee bond-dealer, Yale-educated or not. 

The Yale education and the ostentatious wealth of the main characters validate the disdain with which working people – drivers, butlers, caterers, mechanics, police officers and others – are treated. Carraway refers to them as ‘ordinary people’, elevating his own milieu onto the extraordinary plain inhabited by the wealthy and the celebrated. This elevation of celebrity continues into cultural work today. Gatsby lives in New York’s version of Downton Abbeyon a bay on Long Island. He appeals to a craving for an old-world aristocracy.

Critics, notably Lionel Trilling, suggest that the novella highlights the social fissures of 1920s America, illustrated by Carraway’s waspish observations. Carraway describes George Wilson, the mechanic, as ‘spiritless’ and ‘anaemic’. Myrtle Wilson, the victim of the hit-and-run, is introduced as a ‘thickish figure of a woman’, in sharp contrast with Daisy Buchanan who, in Carraway’s accounts, is a breathy waif. Most of the ‘ordinary people’ are not given names. 

I wondered if I might have found Michaelis, the immigrant owner of the cafĂ© next door to Wilson’s garage, a more interesting narrator of this thin tale. Or perhaps a telling by the ‘pale well-dressed negro’, who witnessed the incident, might present a more enlightening account of the fissures in American society in the 1920s. And today. But that wouldn’t do. They are merely ‘ordinary people’.

Critic Lionel Trilling suggests that a ‘modern reader’ knows that ‘in literature the interest in social position must never be taken seriously’. I found that strange, as it immediately set me as an un-modern reader. I am not ‘wholly immune from all ignoble social considerations’.

Trilling acknowledges that ‘Gatsby is said by some to be not quite credible’. He says he is divided between power and dream and thus comes to stand for America itself. Trilling then trumpets a well-worn tune of American exceptionalism.

Ours is the only nation that prides itself upon a dream and gives its name to one, ‘the American Dream’”. 

This is an attempt to aggrandise Gatsby, by affording him noble and Platonic virtues. He can, nonetheless, be read as a duplicitous chancer, who never really grew up. 

I hesitate to wonder if this may be a description of Donald Trump. Events in his presidency have shown that there are more than one ‘American Dream’. Dreams, American and otherwise, are multiple rather than singular, coming as nightmares for many, many people. The social schisms deepened by Trump’s presidency clarify that a singular dream will not suffice, certainly not one which sees a small cadre of wealthy and powerful people, mainly white men, stir a fever of discontent and neglect among the bulk of a population sold short by Gatsby’s version of the ‘Dream’. 

Trilling notes a much-reported spat between Fitzgerald and Hemingway, two writers who enjoyed significant financial success and celebrity in their time. One version of it has Fitzgerald remarking that ‘The rich are different from us’ and Hemingway replying ‘Yes, they have more money.’ A society that divides power from dreams and affords the former only to a wealthy elite destroys the dreams of everyone else.

Other versions of the ‘Dream’ were available in Fitzgerald’s time. The work of Theodore Dreiser, notably Sister Carrie (1900) and An American Tragedy (1925) and novels like Sinclair Lewis’ Arrowsmith (1925) presented different dreams and tragedies. They were well-regarded and prize-winning. They do not have the same hold on ‘modern readers’. Too many ‘ignoble social considerations’ perhaps? 

Fitzgerald’s novella is famed as a grand romance between Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan. Gatsby is obsessed with re-igniting it, going to extreme lengths to get closer to Daisy, yet always too timid to make a direct assertion of his love. I found it hard to believe that, in a social scene where bacchanalian carry-on was in full swing at the parties in his house, Gatsby was intimidated by the prospect of breaking up a marriage or of Daisy having an extramarital affair. Perhaps, like much about his life and behaviour, his passion was a chimera. Gatsby’s ardour is thwarted by his immaturity and, latterly, by Daisy’s venality and materialism. She follows the money in the end. Their mutual dismissal of ‘ordinary people’ enables them to dismiss each other, with the aid of Tom Buchanan’s self-serving chicanery. 

I sensed, on this reading, that the core romance is between Carraway and Gatsby. It is a chillingly modern bromance. The beloved, Gatsby, is not aware of the ardent affection coming his way, as he is too possessed by his selfish need to make Carraway do his bidding. 

I almost stopped (re-)reading about a third of the way into the book. I grew fed up of the vain hero, the incredible narrator and all the dreadful people. I ploughed on, through the snobbery and the sometimes glorious sentences, aware that literary style is rarely assigned to books featuring the poor or powerless, regardless of the wonders of Margaret Atwood and Charles Dickens. Writing possessed of style is sometimes no more than a cover for books about rich people. 

I enjoyed the ending, when it seemed the narrative voice grew more resonant and mature, as if Carraway, now thirty years old, had finally grown up. At the cost of three lives.

I didn’t go as far as to take up a suggestion by a friend of Fitzgerald’s, essayist, short-story and Academy Award-nominated screenwriter, Dorothy Parker. I don’t know if she was referring to The Great Gatsby, when she said

This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force.

Would I recommend you read/re-read The Great Gatsby? A muted ‘yes’, if only for its fame and brevity.



The Great Gatsby; F. Scott Fitzgerald; Wordsworth Editions; Hertfordshire, 1993

The Liberal Imagination-essays on literature and society; Lionel Trilling; Viking Press; New York, 1950

The Heart of Darkness; from Youth: A Narrative; Joseph Conrad; William Blackwood and Sons: London, 1902

https://breathingwithalimp.blogspot.com/2018/11/no-heart-just-dim-light-in-heart-of.html

The Dead; from Dubliners; James Joyce; Grant Richards; London, 1914

The Wasteland; T.S. Eliot; Hogarth Press; London, 1923


www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter