Friday, 21 November 2025

WATCHING TRAD AT FOYLE FILM FESTIVAL


The 38th Foyle Film Festival (FFF) opened on Wednesday 19th November with a screening of Lance Daly’s latest film TRAD.

A full house engages in a very warm, frank and informative q&a with writer/producer/director Daly and two cast members. They share insights into their experiences which go much wider than just one film. They illuminate the work, the sacrifices and pleasures, the decisions, set backs, joys and woes of film-making. 

It makes for a splendid film festival evening, the epitome of what such an event could be, ably handled by festival director Christopher Morrison. The FFF welcomes Daly back from a previous occasion when he screened one of his first films, early in the festival’s 38 year history. 

His previous film to TRAD is Black 47, made in 2018, drawing a deserter from British imperial wars in Afghanistan back to his famine-ravaged home in Connemara, where he enacts vengeance, on behalf of his stricken family, on the local soldiery and landlords.

TRAD is a very different film, though set once more in the west of Ireland, within an Irish-speaking family, where the mother is a driven music and dance teacher and the father is an easy-going musician. It is a coming-of-age film for the young woman, Shona McAnally (Megan Nic Fhionnaghaile), who is bursting to get away from the round of féilte, fleadhanna, lessons and rehearsals under her mother’s oppressive drive. Her younger brother Mickey (Dallán Woods) tags along when Shona hooks up with a van-load of summer bohemians, playing music, camping on beaches and ‘having the laugh’, until  Shona ‘shifts’ the handsome banjo player in his tent. 

Mickey calls his Mammy on his hidden phone. Micky goes home. 

Shona walks away from the van and is joined by a shy young guitarist, Ray (Cathal Coade Parker), who has been aching to talk to her. They walk, hitch, busk and camp. He has a decent tent, being a college student from a family with a few bob. They busk south through Mayo and into Galway, as friends and fellows. They reach Galway city and the tension within and between them erupts at Spanish Arch, in a scene beside the Claddagh, where they pitch for the last time. 

Shona destroys her fiddle, in a rage of frustration.

The resolution follows with Shona re-joining her family as a grown-up young woman, though she still wears the hapless green dress her mother gives her for performing at the Fléadh in Mullingar. All elements of the summer journeying are united in a fantastic pub session, with multiple instruments of the Irish tradition and some fine sean-nós dancing. That scene, actually shot in the Four Provinces Pub in Dublin, is a triumph of film-making and editing, fair play to Lance Daly and his colleagues.

The acting is terrific, the scenery is marvellous, the story is thin, but works and the music throughout is tremendous. The editing and direction are superb. Still, I left the cinema unsettled. I cannot recommend the film. 

I was unsettled by the character Harky (Aiden Gillen). He was the clearest manifestation of coercive control I’ve seen on screen for a while. He is older than the others. He owns and drives the van. Having offered a lift home to Shona and Mickey, he drives past their house, then asks Shona to stay on. He doesn’t force her, but he doesn’t make it easy for her to get off. Mickey follows along, until he feels abandoned. The crack goes out of it.

Harky takes all their phones. He controls communication with the outside world. He controls the money, producing a wad of cash when someone says they need food. This moment provides a great slice of dialogue:

- Did you rob a bank?

- No, the banks rob us.

Harky takes them to his base, an isolated ruin, with a large pond in the middle. It is just the spot for someone half-cut to fall into. Someone like Mickey, gargling bottles of booze. Harky regales them all with lists of random words and riddles, never answering a question, passing this off as wisdom, when it has all the characteristics of the worst of cultism: hem the acolytes in, set yourself up as the wise-beyond-comprehension guru, control all aspects of their lives.

Mickey and Shona are lucky to get away from him.

This soured the film for me. I should have asked Lance Daly the question:

Why did you choose an instance of coercive control to launch the young people’s road-trip?

TRAD – recommended? See Black 47 instead.




TRAD; film; Lance Daly; Monto Movies; Ireland, 2025


www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter

Sunday, 26 October 2025

WATCHING STILLWATER


Director Thomas McCarthy made the Academy Award-winning film Spotlight (2016). It recounts The Boston Globe’s unravelling of cover-ups of sexual abuse crimes by Roman Catholic clerics and the collusion of Boston law firms. 

His 2021 film Stillwater is available on Channel 4’s catch up service, All 4. While not as strong as Spotlight, it is nonetheless a very insightful treatment of a family tragedy, using a crime thriller story-line to deliver a watchable and moving romance-drama. 

Stillwater presents a telling allegory of the USA today.

These films incline the viewer to keep an eye out for other work by McCarthy.

Bill Baker (Matt Damon) is an American roughneck, built for hard labour on oil rigs and construction sites. He is as taciturn as a mule, but behind the quiet is a fevered anger, stoked by poverty, loss, alcoholism and injustice. He is polite and mannerly. His “Thank you Maam’s” echo throughout the film. He prays with fervour at each meal. His anger - some might term it passion were he middle-class - drives a quest. He lives to prove his daughter’s, Allison Baker (Abigail Breslin), innocence for a crime he is convinced she didn’t commit.     

After a short prologue in Oklahoma, on an oil-field and in his mother-in-law’s house, the film lifts off with Bill when he travels to Marseilles, where his daughter is incarcerated for killing her lover. He has travelled to the French Mediterranean port many times. This trip is different, because he meets Maya, aged 8 (Lilou Siauvard), and her mother Virginie (Camille Cottin).

An uneasy, then warm, relationship grows between the adults, cultivated by Maya’s charm and Bill’s love for the child. There is a running joke at meal-time, when Bill offers hand-holding prayer and invites Maya to conclude with “Dig in”, an echo of his roughneck life. He delivers a great speech about digging and holes through dinner prepartion.

The adults grow closer. In one post-coital, morning-after scene, without dialogue, a gorgeous image of domestic comfort centres on Maya, with colouring pens and paper, grinning knowingly at the adults seated on the nearby sofa. 

Bill has new information. He is determined to track down a local man he is sure will clear his daughter’s name. The search takes him to La Rouvière, Marseille’s city within a city, near the Stade Vélodrome — home to the local football team Olympique de Marseille (OM). Using the stadium as the launch pad for the final scenes fleshes out just how out of his depth, culturally, linguistically and politically Bill is amidst the divisions that characterise Marseilles.

Bill encounters these divisions and the survival techniques people use, when he works for a dodgy builder and makes a solo run into La Rouvière, where he very quickly gets into trouble.

Bill is America, on an individual scale. He just wants to do good. Why can’t people see that? Why won’t people comply? But people have had enough of outsider arrivistes, their demands and their solutions, generally relying on the force of arms or money, as if they were the only people with problems. A friend of Virginie asks Bill if he voted for Trump, expecting him to say ‘yes’. It’s the question and expected answer in the viewer’s mind throughout. 

Alison, Bill’s daughter, is also America, oher own different, individual scale. She just wants to get as far away as possible. Why can’t people let her do what she wants? Why do people bother her? Why won’t people just go away, when she’s had enough of them? But people will take her money to do her bidding, even at great cost to themselves.

Scenes near the end of the film resonate with allegory. 

- A vacuous home-coming for Alison, led by MAGA-yearning politicians and Oklahoma locals, festers cringe. It reminds the viewer of the heart-break of families and the callousness of politicians, as seen in detainee returns in Israel and Palestine recently. 

- Alison sits smoking with Virginie, while on day-release parole. She reveals how broken she feels, without acknowledging that her actions are the driver for the tragedies that grip the people around her.

- Later, she sits on the stoop with her father, in a classic image of America at home. She says the world still looks the same. Bill says it has changed. It will never be the same to him again. The deep malaise in Allison, which she takes to herself, is an allegory for contemporary US society. Bill sees his home place with new eyes, following his experiences out of the country. His trials overseas have given him new insights. Allison sees only herself and her deserving.

Marseilles is Marseilles, in all its beauty and depravity, its vivacity and division. 

Jean-Claude Izzo, a French poet, playwright, screenwriter, and novelist wrote three neo-noir  crime novels set in Marseilles in the 1990s, worth reading for a view of the city’s divisions and the lives people build there: Total ChaosChourmo, and Solea.

Stillwater naturally echoes The French Connection, though Bill is not Jimmy ‘Popeye’ Doyle. He is tough enough, but less vicious. His sensibilities are awakened by Maya and Virginie, but his legacy-quest to aid his daughter impels him into violence and tragedy.

Stillwater? Highly recommended.



Stillwater; film; Thomas McCarthy; Participant Media LLC, 2021

French Connection; film; William Friedkin; Philip D’Antoni Productions; 1971

Jean Claude Izzo; writer; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude Izzo

An article on Marseilles: https://themarkaz.org/cities-within-the-city/



www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter

Wednesday, 8 October 2025

WATCHING ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER


When Peter Bradshaw’s film of the week in The Guardian (London) gets a five star review and David Fears in Rolling Stone (New York) describes it as 

a parable about fathers and daughters, a conspiracy thriller for the ICE age, an ensemble comedy that encourages all-stars to get their best eccentricity on, the single greatest film of 2025

One Battle After Another might be a Hollywood film worth seeing. It is. At least twice.

Director Paul Thomas Anderson has a back catalogue of Hollywood art-hits that sets movie moguls drooling. His oil baron epic, There will be Blood, starring Daniel Day Lewis, walisted as ‘the greatest film of of the 21st Century’ by New York Times critics. 

Is Anderson ‘the thinking person’s Quentin Tarrantino’?

That auteur’s drive is seen in the opening scenes of One Battle After Another, when an underground revolutionary grouping, French 75, led by African American women, releases detainees from a holding centre, while pulverising it. We meet two of the film’s protagonists: Perfidia Beverly Hills, (Teyana Taylor) and "Ghetto" Pat Calhoun / Bob Ferguson, (Leonardo Di Caprio). They exist in a highly sexualised world, charged with the power of her political energies and the explosive materials he uses. Their inter-racial relationship thrives on sex, war and revolution. It is heady stuff, and just about holds together as an extended prologue, to the gear change that shifts time forward 16 years, when a product of their union is introduced. 

We meet Willa Ferguson/Charlene Calhoun (Chase Inifiniti) at a martial arts session with her sensei  Sergio St. Carlos, (Benficio del Toro). He is a Karate teacher and a leader of the off-grid community in Baktan Cross, where ‘wet backs’, immigrants from across the border south of California, find scantuary.

This scene uses the Steely Dan song Dirty Work (from Can’t Buy a Cheap Thrill, 1975) in what one commentator described as ‘the greatest needle drop in cinema today’. Watching and listening to it, the viewer realises that once again Paul Tomas Anderson has drawn from his childhood in Hollywood to put a film experience in front of us that could only come from that cinema-saturated part of the world.

Introducing us to Willa Ferguson re-introduces us to another of the film’s heavy-weight protagonists: Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn), a military officer hot on the case of the French 75, and most particularly, on the case of Perfidia Beverly Hills. Lockjaw’s obsession with Hills, a not entirely convincing relationship, opens the thread of the story that lampoons far-right ideology and groupings, in particular its fear of miscegenation.

The film’s good guys are leftist radicals, acting against authoritarian elements within the US government. Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his daughter Willa (Chase Infiniti) live under assumed names in Baktan Cross, as French 75 goes further underground, with informers penetrating its membership. Colonel Stephen J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn) hunts the group down.

The scenes of the group attacking an immigrant detention centre feel current, rather than historic. Time is eliding over itself and everything is happening now, ait can in the best dramatic work. We are in screen time/stage time/now, with Time’s Arrow perpetually moving forward. The characters age and grow frail (Bobor feisty (Willa). He becomes protective, if inept, Dad. She becomes a woman, re-working the energy of her mother. The world changes and la lucha continua (the struggle continues).

Anderson doesn’t offer a handbook for the most effective form of rebellion. He presents Bob’s efforts to reconcile his youthful idealism with his middle-aged caution. Willa embodies the paradox of the future Bob fought for, a simultaneous win and loss, whose responsibility eventually passes to Willa herself. There will be young people fighting fascism, however they can. Anderson offers a moderate, incremental-change vision of political upheaval, along with the admission that things could get much worse. There is no utopia or celebration of political violence by state or anti-state forces. There is simply the endeavour by individuals to band together, to protect themselves from the violence of poverty and oppression, finding hope and love in their young, even as they age. 

They live the necessary indulgence of hoping the fight isn’t over. 

La Lucha Continua. Ahora. Siempre. 

When Colonel Stephen J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn) is loaded into a refuge incinerator by two figures in white hazmat suits, we know the dirty work continues.


I'm a fool to do your dirty work, oh yeah

I don't wanna do your dirty work no more

I'm a fool to do your dirty work, oh yeah


One Battle After Another – recommended? Highly.




One Battle After Another; film; Paul Tomas Anderson; Ghoulardi Film Company; USA; 2025



www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter

Tuesday, 16 September 2025

READING LUCY BY THE SEA BY ELIZABETH STROUT


Lucy by the Sea by Elizabeth Strout is a sweet, sad book, set in ‘this sweet sad place we call Earth’, as written in its last line. It is short and slow, readable and occasionally tiresome. It is set among older, white, East Coast North Americans and their adult children. It is full of their First World woes. Not that the woes of miscarriages and relationship breakdowns are to be disregarded, but if context in a novel matters, then the context here is benign, even with the ravages of Covid 19 close at hand. Thus the woes are diminished.

The novel sits in the second of two traditions, cleverly described by Colm Tóibín in his essay Losing the Plot. Tóibín suggests stories are either driven by plot, with actions and their consequences, or stories work by creating an atmosphere through language, its rhythms and textures. Lucy by the Sea is in the second silo. That will determine a reader’s response to it.

The language is conversational, as Lucy talks directly to the reader.

Here is is a story about people we met through Margaret and Bob. 

But let me mention some sad things that happened before the event, … 

I noticed that I did not feel sad.

I do think this: I do think it was the happiest I have been in my life.

This gives the book a disarmingly child-like tone. The title reminds the reader of children’s books. Strout’s conversational style enables her to be candid and intimate in her presentation of the characters and the richness of the small world she creates for them. There are echoes of the work of John Updike in Couples.

Lucy by the Sea is a pandemic novel, infused by the sensibilities of the well-off. Lucy, and other successful writers, have the means to flee New York, when the city locks down in March 2020, often to coastal colonies, cocktails in hand, with the siren calls of mass plague well behind them.

There’s not much vigour in Lucy’s rambling musings on fragility and regret. She recognises she is ageing and becoming aged, as are the people closest to her. She is self-absorbed, turning inward, to savour her own exceptionalism. Just like her country at this time.

Any notion of characterising this novel as an example of ‘the local being universal’ is unfounded. Unless the reader accepts that life in the USA is universally human in a way that life in Indonesia, Zambia, Brazil or Spain is not. I doubt Arundhati Roy will right a novel, where she and her family escape from a pandemic by moving down the coast from Mumbai, detaching themselves from the context of the plague happening all around. 

When Lucy yearns for New York and her previous life, she mourns less for the city’s Covid victims and more for her lost loves and her good life. Isolated yet secure, she ponders her current good fortune, while failing to connect it to her impoverished origins.

She knows that some people are luckier than others. She has no answer as to why this is so.

The question of why some people are luckier than others,” Lucy observes. “I have no answer for this.” 

This may be disarming, but it is also tiresome and disingenuous.

The reliance on luck – fortune – without any sense of context, confirms the novel’s immaturity. Lucy and her fellows are child-like, cocooned by their privilege. They are ‘un-present’, except in their cocoon.

Strout’s work is prize-winning and she is lionised. There is a vibrant market for her novels. Principal characters overlap between her books. They are hugely successful, commercially and critically. The friend, who pointed me at her work, suggested I read Olive Ketteridge. I’m not sure. I’ll certainly have a few reads in between. Something by Barbara Kingsolver perhaps.

Lucy by the Sea by Elizabeth Strout? Recommended? If you fancy something sweet, sad and self-involved. It won’t scare the horses in the paddock outside.




Lucy by the Sea; book; Elizabeth Strout, Penguin/Viking, London, 2023


www.facebook.com/DaveDugganWriter